# $OMI Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-18 01:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $OMI  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-18 01:20 UTC (2026-08-18T01:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-18-01-20/crypto/OMI  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-18-01-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 68
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 68


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @taresky
> **Author:** [@taresky](https://x.com/taresky)  
> **Metrics:** 13 likes · 0 retweets · 3 comments · 4.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/taresky/status/2089509837050908713](https://x.com/taresky/status/2089509837050908713)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a financial transaction record displaying a USDT compensation of 0.0050523 credited on 2026-08-17, alongside a unified account history showing TUTUSDT perpetual position with significant losses of -488,077.1499 USDT (-188.08% return rate). This visually confirms the poster's claim that the Bitget compensation (360K USDT) matches the actual contract losses from their trading positions.  

> 
> "#Crypto 

Forgot to check, but the 2.4 million Bitget compensated yesterday afternoon (360k u) has arrived in the account.

Syncing with everyone: this time, they did compensate according to the rules. The amount matches exactly with the actual loss from my contract positions as"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@RealRandyChavez` (https://x.com/RealRandyChavez)