# $XTZ Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-15 10:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $XTZ  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-15 10:50 UTC (2026-08-15T10:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-15-10-50/crypto/XTZ  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-15-10-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 105
- **Likes:** 6
- **Retweets:** 5
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 5, Likes: 6, Impressions: 105


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Donaxbt
> **Author:** [@Donaxbt](https://x.com/Donaxbt)  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 549 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Donaxbt/status/2088580112195191224](https://x.com/Donaxbt/status/2088580112195191224)  


> **Visual Context:** A 1-hour Bittensor (TAO) chart shows the asset trading around $0.0888 after peaking near $0.0888 and currently sitting at 0.084847, down approximately -0.00%, illustrating the broader sell pressure mentioned in the post regarding Subnet 64 (Chutes) underperforming relative to Lium (Subnet 51) since the "RootReborn" upgrade.  

> 
> "Honestly kinda Sucks how Subnet 64 | Chutes has been underperforming since “RootReborn” went live, truly expected it to do exactly the opposite 

Full week of sell pressure Vs Lium | Subnet 51 which is doing extremely well. 

Might reassess and do some changes to my subnets"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@TemiXYZ` (https://x.com/TemiXYZ)