# $POL Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-14 16:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $POL  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-14 16:30 UTC (2026-08-14T16:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-14-16-30/crypto/POL  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-14-16-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 3.7K
- **Likes:** 12
- **Retweets:** 2
- **Comments:** 9

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 9, Retweets: 2, Likes: 12, Impressions: 3662


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @banteg
> **Author:** [@banteg](https://x.com/banteg)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 13 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/banteg/status/2088304245510451331](https://x.com/banteg/status/2088304245510451331)  


> 
> "staked percentage and concentration lie on different axes. you can have less total staked with higher institutional concentration, which is the likely outcome of the proposed regime.

social slashing has never been an unstaked eth holder referendum. so the requirement for a large"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@laoyingkhq` (https://x.com/laoyingkhq)