# $PYUSD Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-14 10:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $PYUSD  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-14 10:20 UTC (2026-08-14T10:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-14-10-20/crypto/PYUSD  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-14-10-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 18
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 18


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @stablemark_
> **Author:** [@stablemark_](https://x.com/stablemark_)  
> **Metrics:** 19 likes · 3 retweets · 8 comments · 1.4K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/stablemark_/status/2088201887451377778](https://x.com/stablemark_/status/2088201887451377778)  


> **Visual Context:** A S/W Scam Watch dashboard displays a "Fake Engagement Check" for the project @thebunkerhood, showing a Risk Score of 98/100 (High Risk) based on 12,000-15,793 fast profiles analyzed, alongside metrics like 100 follower batches, 92 random coordination, and 55.4% suspicious OST activity. The image visually supports the post's claim of scoring "a ridiculous 98/100—the highest I've ever seen," reinforcing the high-risk assessment of the project.  

> 
> "While I have some free time between building, I've been checking out a few degen projects, and 
@thebunkerhood
 caught my attention

Ran it through the Fake Engagement Checker on my website and it scored a ridiculous 98/100 - the highest I've ever seen"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@BitgetWalletX` (https://x.com/BitgetWalletX)