# $GROK Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-14 00:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $GROK  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-14 00:00 UTC (2026-08-14T00:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-14-00-00/crypto/GROK  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-14-00-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 6.1K
- **Likes:** 65
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 12

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 12, Retweets: 0, Likes: 65, Impressions: 6090


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @hash_bender
> **Author:** [@hash_bender](https://x.com/hash_bender)  
> **Metrics:** 24 likes · 5 retweets · 2 comments · 3.0K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/hash_bender/status/2088006857575313846](https://x.com/hash_bender/status/2088006857575313846)  


> **Visual Context:** The image compares Bitcoin and Sia block-header formats, showing fields such as version, parentID/hashPrevBlock, merkle root, timestamp, difficulty/nBits, nonce, and commitment fields, with Bitcoin using 80 bytes and Sia using roughly 1.5 KB. It illustrates why existing Blake2b ASICs cannot mine BIP-110 Sia chains, because the header fields—and therefore the required hashing shape—do not match.  

> 
> "Just FYI the Blake2B ASICs that exist today will not work for BIP-110 chain.  The headers are different shape and there's no way to change that."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@claudeebum` (https://x.com/claudeebum)