# $MOMO Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-13 20:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $MOMO  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-13 20:40 UTC (2026-08-13T20:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-20-40/crypto/MOMO  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-20-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 222
- **Likes:** 15
- **Retweets:** 3
- **Comments:** 3

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 3, Retweets: 3, Likes: 15, Impressions: 222


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @thelearningpill
> **Author:** [@thelearningpill](https://x.com/thelearningpill)  
> **Metrics:** 14 likes · 1 retweets · 12 comments · 1.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/thelearningpill/status/2087872049977143444](https://x.com/thelearningpill/status/2087872049977143444)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows two charts: a "Cumulative Metrics Over Time" line chart (with Mined, Total Minted, and Total Balance around 450, 350, and 100) and a "Burn Over Time" bar chart displaying daily burn amounts with a tooltip highlighting August 1, 2025 at 4,718 daily burn and 12.10M total burn. These visualizations support the post's argument by illustrating Canton Network's high fees (top-earning chain) alongside burn data that reveals a burn-to-mint ratio of just 0.662, explaining why fees aren't translating into token value appreciation for $CC.  

> 
> "Everyone's watching 
@CantonNetwork
's fees.

Almost nobody's watching the one number that decides whether those fees ever reach 
$CC
.

It's the burn-to-mint ratio, and it's 0.662 (end Q2).

Here's why that single figure explains a top-earning chain with a falling coin"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@kimbokitten` (https://x.com/kimbokitten)