# $SPYON Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-13 14:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $SPYON  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-13 14:40 UTC (2026-08-13T14:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-14-40/crypto/SPYON  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-14-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 204
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 204


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @solotop999
> **Author:** [@solotop999](https://x.com/solotop999)  
> **Metrics:** 9 likes · 1 retweets · 5 comments · 2.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/solotop999/status/2087894100653781216](https://x.com/solotop999/status/2087894100653781216)  


> **Visual Context:** A pixelated green zombie-like NFT character with exposed red flesh and tattered clothing is displayed on a glowing purple digital platform, accompanied by the username "@satoshi99" in the corner, visually representing the infamous artwork reveal controversy referenced in the post about Martin van Blerk's project that raised over $70M through 7,750 NFTs starting at 3 ETH each.  

> 
> "Do you still remember this disastrously ugly NFT?

The young founder Martin van Blerk, born in 2001–2002.

 Sold 7,750 NFTs via auction.
 Starting price 3 ETH.
 Project raked in about 23,055 ETH.
 Equivalent to over $70M.

After minting, the revealed artwork turned out to"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@DiarioBitcoin` (https://x.com/DiarioBitcoin)