# $SHIB Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-13 10:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $SHIB  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-13 10:00 UTC (2026-08-13T10:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-10-00/crypto/SHIB  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-10-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 943
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 943


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @cryptojack
> **Author:** [@cryptojack](https://x.com/cryptojack)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 1.6K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/cryptojack/status/2087841797045191019](https://x.com/cryptojack/status/2087841797045191019)  


> **Visual Context:** A SoSoValue chart displays Bitcoin spot ETF flows from May 18 to August 12, 2026, showing predominantly negative daily net flows (red bars, reaching as low as -700M) that mirror the declining BTC price trend (black/gold lines falling from ~$100B to ~$75B), illustrating the mixed and often negative ETF demand that aligns with the post's observation of inconsistent spot demand for BTC.  

> 
> "Flows into spot #BTC ETFs have become mixed again, according to SoSoValue.

Glassnode notes that there is currently no consistent spot demand for BTC.

CryptoQuant points to a lack of unified demand dynamics across both futures and spot markets."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@shibburn` (https://x.com/shibburn)