# $INJ Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-13 09:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $INJ  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-13 09:00 UTC (2026-08-13T09:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-09-00/crypto/INJ  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-09-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 649
- **Likes:** 63
- **Retweets:** 8
- **Comments:** 49

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 49, Retweets: 8, Likes: 63, Impressions: 649


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @jibrinhabi7158
> **Author:** [@jibrinhabi7158](https://x.com/jibrinhabi7158)  
> **Metrics:** 20 likes · 2 retweets · 21 comments · 103 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/jibrinhabi7158/status/2087796135502995866](https://x.com/jibrinhabi7158/status/2087796135502995866)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of a Canopy (@CNPYNetwork) tweet discussing reputation scoring and trust graphs, highlighting their community app 'Loom' with demo and repo links.  

> 
> "I spent some time looking at the Loom update.

Someone in the community built a stake-weighted trust graph on 
@CNPYNetwork
 It’s designed so reputation actually has to be earned. Sybils don’t get far.

Most reputation systems still feel soft. Easy to game, hard to verify. This one"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@_LeckyMoh` (https://x.com/_LeckyMoh)