# $TUT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-13 03:30 UTC > **Asset:** $TUT > **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-13 03:30 UTC (2026-08-13T03:30:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-03-30/crypto/TUT > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-03-30/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 4 - **Total Impressions:** 8.4K - **Likes:** 45 - **Retweets:** 2 - **Comments:** 17 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 17, Retweets: 2, Likes: 45, Impressions: 8391 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @AkiraRyukyu > **Author:** [@AkiraRyukyu](https://x.com/AkiraRyukyu) > **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 2 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/AkiraRyukyu/status/2087743090329260332](https://x.com/AkiraRyukyu/status/2087743090329260332) > > "transparency matters but financial privacy should still give users control" ### Post #2 by @bella_quack > **Author:** [@bella_quack](https://x.com/bella_quack) > **Metrics:** 9 likes · 0 retweets · 9 comments · 358 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/bella_quack/status/2087733855935758401](https://x.com/bella_quack/status/2087733855935758401) > **Visual Context:** The image promotes Canopy Network's upcoming mainnet feature with the text "Coming in Mainnet: Spin up your own Canopy Validator," showcasing a validator dashboard interface displaying testnet data with multiple validators (Val-55 through Val-63) showing metrics like blocks, rewards, APR, and CNPY amounts. The clean UX design and validator management interface visually reinforces the post's message about Canopy solving integration pain points by providing a streamlined interface that abstracts away blockchain complexities like gas models and chain-specific constraints. > > "They spent weeks designing the product. UX is clean. Logic is solid. Then the integration phase starts. And suddenly everything depends on external constraints they never designed for. Gas model. Execution limits. Chain-specific quirks. @CNPYNetwork changes where that pain" ### Post #3 by @Snz_BTC > **Author:** [@Snz_BTC](https://x.com/Snz_BTC) > **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 244 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Snz_BTC/status/2087743931467301011](https://x.com/Snz_BTC/status/2087743931467301011) > > "As much of an embarrassment the BIP-110 softfork was, the upcoming POW hardfork will be an even bigger embarrassment simply because it is a more radical move and way fewer people will be interested." ### Post #4 by @XRPapiCrypto > **Author:** [@XRPapiCrypto](https://x.com/XRPapiCrypto) > **Metrics:** 8 likes · 1 retweets · 0 comments · 242 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/XRPapiCrypto/status/2087719547910389854](https://x.com/XRPapiCrypto/status/2087719547910389854) > > "Wait until he hears about @FlareNetworks & FIP. 16" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@nehalzzzz1` (https://x.com/nehalzzzz1) - `@MarketProphit` (https://x.com/MarketProphit) - `@truonggiangle99` (https://x.com/truonggiangle99) - `@Cryptocowboys6` (https://x.com/Cryptocowboys6)