# $SR Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-13 01:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $SR  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-13 01:50 UTC (2026-08-13T01:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-01-50/crypto/SR  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-13-01-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 107
- **Likes:** 10
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 0, Likes: 10, Impressions: 107


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @1Bitcoin_user
> **Author:** [@1Bitcoin_user](https://x.com/1Bitcoin_user)  
> **Metrics:** 28 likes · 7 retweets · 1 comments · 719 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/1Bitcoin_user/status/2087551550596186402](https://x.com/1Bitcoin_user/status/2087551550596186402)  


> **Visual Context:** A flowchart showing the blockchain forks from Bitcoin's Genesis Block, branching into BCH (CTOR Fork on 2018-11-16), BSV, and BTC (Segwit Fork on 2017-08-24).  

> 
> "Correct. The strength of BitcoinSV remains in the integrity of its protocol, which conforms to what Bitcoin is, BSV.

2017 Fork #1 (BTC/BCH) BTC -> Adds Segwit 

2018 Fork #2 (BCH/BSV) BCH -> new OP_CODES  

2008 Original Chain BSV -> no block cap, no segwit, no new op codes."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@YonesMahmoudi99` (https://x.com/YonesMahmoudi99)