# $MONSTERSNFT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-12 22:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $MONSTERSNFT  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-12 22:40 UTC (2026-08-12T22:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-12-22-40/crypto/MONSTERSNFT  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-12-22-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 293
- **Likes:** 18
- **Retweets:** 4
- **Comments:** 6

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 6, Retweets: 4, Likes: 18, Impressions: 293


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @MarcanoFilms
> **Author:** [@MarcanoFilms](https://x.com/MarcanoFilms)  
> **Metrics:** 129 likes · 14 retweets · 14 comments · 6.0K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/MarcanoFilms/status/2087471285043363848](https://x.com/MarcanoFilms/status/2087471285043363848)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a Mempool.space dashboard displaying recently mined Bitcoin blocks 961632-961635, each mined by the "Roughnecks" pool, with block 961634 notably collecting 55.7M sats in transaction fees and including 7,899 transactions just minutes before. The bold caption about Roughnecks stacking fees (specifically highlighting the 55.7M sats on block 961634) directly corresponds to this on-chain data showing the pool's successful fee capture amid high transaction volume.  

> 
> "We told them not to fuck with us.
Meanwhile Roughnecks just stacked 961634 + 961635 on the only chain that still rejects the spam.
55.7M sats in fees on 961634.
Fresh block minutes ago.
Wildcatting continues.
Bitcoin didn’t stall. They did.
Mempool.marcanotrades.com"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Monstersnft_` (https://x.com/Monstersnft_)