# $MUORIFIELD Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-12 21:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $MUORIFIELD  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-12 21:40 UTC (2026-08-12T21:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-12-21-40/crypto/MUORIFIELD  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-12-21-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 342
- **Likes:** 40
- **Retweets:** 3
- **Comments:** 17

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 17, Retweets: 3, Likes: 40, Impressions: 342


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @MoparMining
> **Author:** [@MoparMining](https://x.com/MoparMining)  
> **Metrics:** 7 likes · 0 retweets · 3 comments · 241 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/MoparMining/status/2087628741249782238](https://x.com/MoparMining/status/2087628741249782238)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of a post by Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) detailing facts about a contentious Bitcoin hardfork, mentioning the creation of 'Bpedo', attacks by former Bitcoin pools, the importance of full nodes like Bitcoin Knots, and expected mitigations by September 1st.  

> 
> "what the actual fuck? 

No - just no....  BIP110 attempted to fork and did shortly thereafter it stalled - they have produced 4 blocks in 4 days. As for the "forcing CSAM" - On average 0% of any Bitcoin block contains CSAM and approximately less than 1% to around 2% of a standard"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@theehilia` (https://x.com/theehilia)