# $MILADY Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-12 18:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $MILADY  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-12 18:20 UTC (2026-08-12T18:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-12-18-20/crypto/MILADY  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-12-18-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 323
- **Likes:** 7
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 0, Likes: 7, Impressions: 323


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @jamesjasmy
> **Author:** [@jamesjasmy](https://x.com/jamesjasmy)  
> **Metrics:** 14 likes · 5 retweets · 3 comments · 460 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/jamesjasmy/status/2087518143170154660](https://x.com/jamesjasmy/status/2087518143170154660)  


> **Visual Context:** The image displays a dark red metric card showing **-70.60%** in red text above a **3M** label, representing a three-month performance decline. This visually reinforces the post's criticism of Chiliz ($CHZ), highlighting the steep 70.6% drop the token has suffered over the past three months and underscoring the urgency of the holder's questions about the project's tokenomics.  

> 
> "$CHZ 
@Chiliz
  down 70.6% in three months. 
That's a bitter pill to swallow as a Holder! 

Two critical questions for the team as a matter of urgency:

• How do you plan to fix these broken, extractive tokenomics that's been diluting holders?

• Isn't it time to review the"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Religious0ne` (https://x.com/Religious0ne)