# $CRV Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-12 01:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $CRV  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-12 01:20 UTC (2026-08-12T01:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-12-01-20/crypto/CRV  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-12-01-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 876
- **Likes:** 8
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 1, Likes: 8, Impressions: 876


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @donovanchoy
> **Author:** [@donovanchoy](https://x.com/donovanchoy)  
> **Metrics:** 5 likes · 1 retweets · 1 comments · 479 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/donovanchoy/status/2087245859566281070](https://x.com/donovanchoy/status/2087245859566281070)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot highlights "Spotlight: Doubling the DLMM Fee Share," noting that on May 19 2026, Meteora's protocol cut of LP fees doubled from 5% to 10% with no LPs migrating to other venues after six weeks. This supports the post's claim that Meteora raised fees without losing liquidity providers, contrasting with Uniswap's recent fee switch that has LPs threatening to leave for Aerodrome.  

> 
> "Meteora raised prices and customers did not leave

From 
@MeteoraInside
 Q2 report: DLMM fees doubled from 5 to 10% and LP retention went from 48.4% to 48.5% after

Uniswap turned on the fee switch last month and LPs are threatening to migrate to Aerodrome lol"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@StakeDAOHQ` (https://x.com/StakeDAOHQ)