# $0XREXNFTCRYPTO Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-11 15:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $0XREXNFTCRYPTO  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 15:40 UTC (2026-08-11T15:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-11-15-40/crypto/0XREXNFTCRYPTO  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-11-15-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 5
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 5


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @zooko
> **Author:** [@zooko](https://x.com/zooko)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 42 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/zooko/status/2087202656217624666](https://x.com/zooko/status/2087202656217624666)  


> **Visual Context:** A text block discussing the history of public-key cryptography, questioning whether the term "public keys" originated with Rivest, Shamir, and Adleman (1977) or Diffie and Hellman's "New Directions in Cryptography" (1976).  

> 
> "I asked an AI and it turns out that it was Diffie and Hellman.

Oh! And here's the corrected terminology that we can all start using instead of calling it "public key cryptography"!

"Non-secret cryptography"--Ellis, Cocks, Williamson (1970)."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@0xRexnftcrypto` (https://x.com/0xRexnftcrypto)