# $BDX Social Sentiment & Intelligence β€” 2026-08-11 06:00 UTC > **Asset:** $BDX > **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 06:00 UTC (2026-08-11T06:00:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-11-06-00/crypto/BDX > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-11-06-00/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 6 - **Total Impressions:** 230 - **Likes:** 29 - **Retweets:** 3 - **Comments:** 25 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 25, Retweets: 3, Likes: 29, Impressions: 230 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @Tran_Today > **Author:** [@Tran_Today](https://x.com/Tran_Today) > **Metrics:** 29 likes Β· 4 retweets Β· 6 comments Β· 987 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Tran_Today/status/2087000693215490285](https://x.com/Tran_Today/status/2087000693215490285) > **Visual Context:** Vietnamese promotional graphic for 'Reputa Score v3.0' announcing a major evolution update with features like Wallet Intelligence, Scam Radar, EVO Beasts NFT, and a guide to joining the Pi Network Mainnet. > > "π—ͺπ—˜π—•πŸ― π—œπ—¦π—‘'𝗧 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗔 π—¦π—¬π—¦π—§π—˜π—  - π—œπ—§'𝗦 𝗔 π—™π—’π—¨π—‘π——π—”π—§π—œπ—’π—‘ 𝗔𝗑𝗗 𝗧π—₯π—¨π—˜ 𝗙π—₯π—˜π—˜π——π—’π—  𝗙𝗒π—₯ π—¨π—¦π—˜π—₯𝗦 ➀ After 3 days of experiencing Reputa Score on Pi Browser, I truly realized one thing: when stepping into a truly on-chain Web3 utility, having an" ### Post #2 by @joe_ryba > **Author:** [@joe_ryba](https://x.com/joe_ryba) > **Metrics:** 3 likes Β· 0 retweets Β· 1 comments Β· 62 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/joe_ryba/status/2087046106253320556](https://x.com/joe_ryba/status/2087046106253320556) > > "Vernissage." ### Post #3 by @BenTodar > **Author:** [@BenTodar](https://x.com/BenTodar) > **Metrics:** 4 likes Β· 0 retweets Β· 5 comments Β· 798 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/BenTodar/status/2087057135293342025](https://x.com/BenTodar/status/2087057135293342025) > > "gm, Slogan meta… we’ve started it, but only few can see it." ### Post #4 by @0xleff > **Author:** [@0xleff](https://x.com/0xleff) > **Metrics:** 0 likes Β· 0 retweets Β· 0 comments Β· 158 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/0xleff/status/2087055902599967177](https://x.com/0xleff/status/2087055902599967177) > > "ηŒ΄ε­εΈηš„TGηΎ€ζ€ŽδΉˆε…¨ζ˜―ε€§ε‚»ι€Όε‘’οΌŸ" ### Post #5 by @Cointelegraph > **Author:** [@Cointelegraph](https://x.com/Cointelegraph) > **Metrics:** 20 likes Β· 2 retweets Β· 19 comments Β· 14.1K views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Cointelegraph/status/2087056701031620854](https://x.com/Cointelegraph/status/2087056701031620854) > **Visual Context:** A treemap visualization titled "ColdCard Hack: Total Balance and by Attacker Address (Amount of BTC)" shows the distribution of stolen BTC across attacker wallets, with the top two addressesβ€”bc1qq85v2c926eg6pqxhwp6q7lf6cnsz80qs3fc... (40.97%, 562.0214164 BTC) and bc1qx76cae2706qd5q576feh7xq8rfcsjpf2htf... (29.05%, 398.47576957 BTC)β€”accounting for the majority of funds. The chart supports the post's claim that a small number of wallets hold most of the stolen BTC, with the top 5 addresses controlling nearly 83% of the confirmed stolen funds. > > "UPDATE: Most of the $BTC stolen in the Coldcard hack sits in just a handful of wallets, with the top 5 addresses holding nearly 83% of the confirmed stolen funds, per CryptoQuant's Julio Moreno." ### Post #6 by @ceooftesla0861 > **Author:** [@ceooftesla0861](https://x.com/ceooftesla0861) > **Metrics:** 11 likes Β· 15 retweets Β· 1 comments Β· 861 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ceooftesla0861/status/2087017572529250738](https://x.com/ceooftesla0861/status/2087017572529250738) > > "video3.twimg.tools/beNIKcwf1.mp4 video3.twimg.tools/beNIKcwf1.mp4" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@0xRiRoyal` (https://x.com/0xRiRoyal) - `@Vanquan_titans` (https://x.com/Vanquan_titans) - `@Rizvi_On_X` (https://x.com/Rizvi_On_X) - `@Ser_nelson` (https://x.com/Ser_nelson)