# $SIG Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-11 00:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $SIG  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 00:00 UTC (2026-08-11T00:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-11-00-00/crypto/SIG  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-11-00-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 89
- **Likes:** 5
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 1, Likes: 5, Impressions: 89


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @ScarcityMan
> **Author:** [@ScarcityMan](https://x.com/ScarcityMan)  
> **Metrics:** 4 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 102 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ScarcityMan/status/2086925441068363826](https://x.com/ScarcityMan/status/2086925441068363826)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of a tweet by Dathon Ohm (@dathon_ohm) about BIP-110, stating that 80% of the node network supports BIP-110's rules, with zero nodes rejecting the BIP-110 chain.  

> 
> "Ok, so the confusion is that he's talking about backwards compatibility of BIP-110's rules. The way restriction of rules work, generally, is that they're backwards compatible with everything else. Resistance is not the same thing as ignoring. There was no significant resistance"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@maturatedart` (https://x.com/maturatedart)