# $CORE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-10 17:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $CORE  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-10 17:50 UTC (2026-08-10T17:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-10-17-50/crypto/CORE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-10-17-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 442
- **Likes:** 16
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 2

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 2, Retweets: 1, Likes: 16, Impressions: 442


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @sashahodler
> **Author:** [@sashahodler](https://x.com/sashahodler)  
> **Metrics:** 43 likes · 11 retweets · 8 comments · 1.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/sashahodler/status/2086830294045196755](https://x.com/sashahodler/status/2086830294045196755)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a highlighted passage from ocean.xyz's Terms of Service defining "Bitcoin" and explicitly granting OCEAN the contractual authority to determine which supported chain qualifies as Bitcoin. This visually supports the post's claim that Ocean rewrote its terms to give itself unilateral power over Bitcoin's chain definition.  

> 
> "Ocean rewrote its TOS on Aug. 4. 

The old 2023 terms didn’t contain this. 

The new terms add an entire section for chain splits, including giving Ocean the contractual ability to determine what is Bitcoin."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@remmy046` (https://x.com/remmy046)