# $SLOTH Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-09 20:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $SLOTH  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-09 20:20 UTC (2026-08-09T20:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-09-20-20/crypto/SLOTH  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-09-20-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 129
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 1, Likes: 1, Impressions: 129


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @tier1haterr
> **Author:** [@tier1haterr](https://x.com/tier1haterr)  
> **Metrics:** 74 likes · 4 retweets · 6 comments · 5.4K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/tier1haterr/status/2086507800491102315](https://x.com/tier1haterr/status/2086507800491102315)  


> **Visual Context:** The image is a tweet from @MidCurveMortal (@MCM) highlighting issues with the FOMO exchange, showing statistics about over 50% of trades being arbitraged, along with screenshots detailing claims of dark pool activity, hidden order types, and an inability to set custom slippage on FOMO transactions. The accompanying post references the slippage issue shown in the image, with a user reporting a $85 trade dropping to a $71.89 position—a nearly 10% instant loss that the FOMO fee structure cannot account for, attributed to the inability to set custom slippage as visually emphasized in the tweet.  

> 
> "$85 in, $71.89 position, half a million fewer tokens than quoted. down ALMOST 10% INSTANTLY 

fomo's official fee explains less than a dollar of that loss. the rest? you can't set custom slippage, so you eat whatever fill they give you. and 
@MidCurveMortal
 already showed"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@EbisusBay` (https://x.com/EbisusBay)