# $TUT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-09 19:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $TUT  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-09 19:30 UTC (2026-08-09T19:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-09-19-30/crypto/TUT  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-09-19-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 2.1K
- **Likes:** 147
- **Retweets:** 6
- **Comments:** 8

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 8, Retweets: 6, Likes: 147, Impressions: 2137


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @secsovereign
> **Author:** [@secsovereign](https://x.com/secsovereign)  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 152 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/secsovereign/status/2086533840512692535](https://x.com/secsovereign/status/2086533840512692535)  


> **Visual Context:** Bitcoin Development Mailing List post titled 'Motion to remove Luke Dashjr from BIP Editors' by Murch, detailing reasons for the motion including exercising editorial authority unfairly during the BIP110 fork proposal.  

> 
> "BIP-110 failed yesterday. Today, Murch filed a motion to remove Luke Dashjr as a BIP editor.

Read the grounds carefully. Some are procedural. Luke assigned a BIP number out of band and merged a PR minutes after it opened. Fine, argue those on the merits.

But one of the listed"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@kriptowarrior` (https://x.com/kriptowarrior)