# $DEADSTOCK Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-09 17:10 UTC > **Asset:** $DEADSTOCK > **Momentum Status:** Sudden Spike > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-09 17:10 UTC (2026-08-09T17:10:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-09-17-10/crypto/DEADSTOCK > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-09-17-10/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 1 - **Total Impressions:** 889 - **Likes:** 27 - **Retweets:** 4 - **Comments:** 8 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 8, Retweets: 4, Likes: 27, Impressions: 889 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @OGlamozda > **Author:** [@OGlamozda](https://x.com/OGlamozda) > **Metrics:** 21 likes · 1 retweets · 8 comments · 1.2K views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/OGlamozda/status/2086473996841705482](https://x.com/OGlamozda/status/2086473996841705482) > **Visual Context:** A tweet from @unvault (Unvault.eth) responds to claims about their minting process, stating: "Nope, we are not over allocating and there is no snapshot at all. Minters need the partner NFTs in their wallets when they come to mint." The tweet, tagged with a B24 label, clarifies that minting eligibility requires holding partner NFTs at the time of minting, rather than relying on a pre-mint snapshot. > > "There's no over-allocation in @unvault first phase. There's also no holders snapshot. You just need a partner NFT in your wallet, and you'll be able to mint Bugz. Each project will have limited spots to mint. For example, 500 spots for @thegodpull , 250 spots for" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@DeadStockRH` (https://x.com/DeadStockRH)