# $AVAX Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-08 21:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $AVAX  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-08 21:10 UTC (2026-08-08T21:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-08-21-10/crypto/AVAX  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-08-21-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 155
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 155


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @stephanlivera
> **Author:** [@stephanlivera](https://x.com/stephanlivera)  
> **Metrics:** 149 likes · 16 retweets · 19 comments · 5.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/stephanlivera/status/2086188838108778617](https://x.com/stephanlivera/status/2086188838108778617)  


> **Visual Context:** Two tweets from Luke Dashjr @LukeDashjr claim mining pools Antpool and f2pool are "attacking Bitcoin" by not signaling support for the BIP 110 proposal, with the first tweet (43m ago) receiving 10K views and 318 likes, and the follow-up (7m ago) noting @f2pool joins in, with 897 views. The accompanying post highlights the irony that Dashjr is accusing these pools of attacking Bitcoin while Ocean—a pool associated with him—just mined a non-110 block itself.  

> 
> "Ironic. 
@lukedashjr
 thinks Antpool and f2pool are 'joining the attack' (by not signalling 110), and then... Ocean just mined a non-110 block!"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@FrankLambeek` (https://x.com/FrankLambeek)