# $ARC Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-08 14:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $ARC  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-08 14:10 UTC (2026-08-08T14:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-08-14-10/crypto/ARC  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-08-14-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 435
- **Likes:** 12
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 8

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 8, Retweets: 0, Likes: 12, Impressions: 435


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @yourfriendSOMMI
> **Author:** [@yourfriendSOMMI](https://x.com/yourfriendSOMMI)  
> **Metrics:** 30 likes · 3 retweets · 0 comments · 2.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/yourfriendSOMMI/status/2086079174696165396](https://x.com/yourfriendSOMMI/status/2086079174696165396)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of a reposted X post from Michael Saylor (@saylor) dated 8/8/2026, stating that with only 2.6% miner signaling, BIP-110 has failed to earn broad miner support and will stall or fork into irrelevance by block 961,632, concluding "Bitcoin is working as designed." The image aligns with the accompanying commentary framing Saylor as opposing BIP-110 in an ongoing Bitcoin civil war, though it offers no direct visual evidence of the "Pro Child-Corn" or censorship accusations made in the caption.  

> 
> "Michael Saylor continues his attack on Bitcoin BIP 110.

 Saylor is on the “Pro Child-Corn” side, wanting Bitcoin data to store altcoins.

 BIP 110 campers are “Pro Censorship” as they choose to designate Spam to be Censored.

Civil War continues.."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@danhtran68` (https://x.com/danhtran68)