# $SOIL Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-07 14:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $SOIL  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-07 14:50 UTC (2026-08-07T14:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-14-50/crypto/SOIL  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-14-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 256
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 256


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @HTMLHODL
> **Author:** [@HTMLHODL](https://x.com/HTMLHODL)  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 1 retweets · 1 comments · 6 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/HTMLHODL/status/2085740047316160624](https://x.com/HTMLHODL/status/2085740047316160624)  


> **Visual Context:** A Blockstream advertisement featuring a shield and keys icon, promoting their 'Multisig' feature with the text 'Bolster your security by requiring multiple Jades to spend funds, eliminating a single point of failure' and a 'WATCH VIDEO' button.  

> 
> "Re codebase… this is no criticism but maybe a good idea then to not recommend or suggest using “multiple Jades” in a multisig setup?"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@soil_farm` (https://x.com/soil_farm)