# $CHZ Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-07 10:40 UTC > **Asset:** $CHZ > **Momentum Status:** Trending Up > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-07 10:40 UTC (2026-08-07T10:40:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-10-40/crypto/CHZ > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-10-40/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 3 - **Total Impressions:** 3.2K - **Likes:** 2 - **Retweets:** 1 - **Comments:** 5 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 5, Retweets: 1, Likes: 2, Impressions: 3156 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @shuigvn > **Author:** [@shuigvn](https://x.com/shuigvn) > **Metrics:** 34 likes · 0 retweets · 35 comments · 606 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/shuigvn/status/2085668865942712463](https://x.com/shuigvn/status/2085668865942712463) > **Visual Context:** The image displays logos for "Few and Far" and "NEAR" alongside isometric illustrations of a connected block and crystalline NFTs, visually referencing the crypto project. The graphic underscores the post's claim that Few and Far, a NEAR-based NFT platform that raised approximately $10 million, failed to deliver as its founder allegedly diverted funds to gambling, crypto trading, and personal expenses. > > "The project raised ~$10 million USD and then took it to the casino Few and Far's founder, Mr. Taj Tarsha, used investor money for gambling, crypto trading, and personal spending instead of developing the project as promised. Not the first case like this, and definitely" ### Post #2 by @FELIXBONIFACE2 > **Author:** [@FELIXBONIFACE2](https://x.com/FELIXBONIFACE2) > **Metrics:** 28 likes · 0 retweets · 28 comments · 338 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/FELIXBONIFACE2/status/2085647466502709714](https://x.com/FELIXBONIFACE2/status/2085647466502709714) > **Visual Context:** A 3D Minecraft-style character with a gray hood and dark mask stands against a blue background, featuring pixelated brown eyes and a black mouth. > > "Gm CT TGIF" ### Post #3 by @CadeONeill > **Author:** [@CadeONeill](https://x.com/CadeONeill) > **Metrics:** 17 likes · 0 retweets · 4 comments · 1.2K views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/CadeONeill/status/2085516772514660663](https://x.com/CadeONeill/status/2085516772514660663) > **Visual Context:** A PLUMEUSDT candlestick chart on a 3d 1h timeframe shows the token's price collapsing from around $0.13 down to roughly $0.012, illustrating the steep -94.81% decline from its all-time high of $0.2475 highlighted in the accompanying post about whether Plume Network is worth buying at current levels. > > "Is $PLUME Plume Network worth buying around $0.012? ‣ Market Cap: $79.37M ‣ ATH MC: $464M ‣ ATH Price: $0.2475 ‣ From ATH Price: -94.81% ● Next $PLUME Token Unlock: Aug 16th, Sep 20th, Oct 18th #plume #plumecrypto #crypto #cryptoaltcoins #altcoins" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@Chiliz` (https://x.com/Chiliz)