# $BITGET Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-07 05:00 UTC > **Asset:** $BITGET > **Momentum Status:** Stable > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-07 05:00 UTC (2026-08-07T05:00:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-05-00/crypto/BITGET > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-05-00/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 2 - **Total Impressions:** 4.1K - **Likes:** 15 - **Retweets:** 2 - **Comments:** 4 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 4, Retweets: 2, Likes: 15, Impressions: 4133 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @NKLinhzk > **Author:** [@NKLinhzk](https://x.com/NKLinhzk) > **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 5 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/NKLinhzk/status/2085593232944324912](https://x.com/NKLinhzk/status/2085593232944324912) > > "do you think the reputation layer stays relevant after the reset" ### Post #2 by @0xWassie > **Author:** [@0xWassie](https://x.com/0xWassie) > **Metrics:** 39 likes · 0 retweets · 30 comments · 754 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/0xWassie/status/2085588761534988612](https://x.com/0xWassie/status/2085588761534988612) > **Visual Context:** The image shows a "Chain Mancers" NFT collection page on what appears to be OpenSea, displaying a floor price of 0.88 ETH, 24H volume of 304.98 ETH, total volume of 304.98 ETH, 4,858 items, and 754 unique owners, with the collection minted on the Robinhood Chain and verified by BlockHashXYZ. The image illustrates the post's claim of a ~10x return, as the 0.88 ETH floor price shown aligns with the stated entry value, compared to the 0.09 ETH original purchase price of the Slonk used to mint a free whitelist spot. > > "minted my Chain Mancers successfully. bought Slonks for 0.09 ETH ($171) and burned it for a free WL. that entry is now worth 0.88 ETH. ~10x from my original cost. higher." --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@BSCNews` (https://x.com/BSCNews) - `@BitgetWalletES` (https://x.com/BitgetWalletES)