# $SHFL Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-07 01:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $SHFL  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-07 01:00 UTC (2026-08-07T01:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-01-00/crypto/SHFL  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-01-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 120
- **Likes:** 2
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 0, Likes: 2, Impressions: 120


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @CryptoExpert101
> **Author:** [@CryptoExpert101](https://x.com/CryptoExpert101)  
> **Metrics:** 4 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 831 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/CryptoExpert101/status/2085530095788106027](https://x.com/CryptoExpert101/status/2085530095788106027)  


> **Visual Context:** The image is a screenshot of an X (formerly Twitter) post from user "shub" (@shubgaur) announcing that he ran a node alone for "304 roots," recompiled and signed it, and expressed surprise that no one else has done the same for $WARR on @RobinhoodApp, displaying a contract address starting with 0xe584c7d24415b65A0F88Ae31cA4f29765D2A5. The accompanying caption criticizes "shub" for "openly shilling a scam," suggesting the post is being viewed as a promotional or fraudulent endorsement of the $WARR token.  

> 
> "F he deleted?

102k topper. 
@cursor_ai
 get rid of 
@shubgaur
 for openly shilling a scam"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@shufflecom` (https://x.com/shufflecom)