# $BRAD1867 Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-06 00:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $BRAD1867  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-06 00:50 UTC (2026-08-06T00:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-06-00-50/crypto/BRAD1867  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-06-00-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 32
- **Likes:** 3
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 2

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 2, Retweets: 0, Likes: 3, Impressions: 32


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @oeeeeup
> **Author:** [@oeeeeup](https://x.com/oeeeeup)  
> **Metrics:** 11 likes · 8 retweets · 1 comments · 1.2K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/oeeeeup/status/2085005437838197149](https://x.com/oeeeeup/status/2085005437838197149)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a transaction history from XDCscan for address 0x879D942f...636927E9D, displaying four entries that confirm two outgoing transfers of 10,705,833.26 XDC and 100.7 XDC to address 0x096CD4EF...49981Ae10, alongside corresponding incoming transactions from 0x2FD95162...44CA8550. This matches the post, which questions the large 10,705,833.26 XDC withdrawal, suggesting the smaller 100.7 XDC transfer served as a test before the main transaction.  

> 
> "What is this withdrawal?

Twice to the same address.
The first time was probably a test transfer.
The second time: 10,705,833.26 XDC
tx【0x59bba372c4cdc8fa0ba6fcfe64dd01b26cd7911c26d1f2c96b74b715d0905801】

#globiance
xdcscan.com/address/0x879d
…"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Brad1867` (https://x.com/Brad1867)