# $MONSTERSNFT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-05 02:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $MONSTERSNFT  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-05 02:10 UTC (2026-08-05T02:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-05-02-10/crypto/MONSTERSNFT  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-05-02-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 53
- **Likes:** 3
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 1, Likes: 3, Impressions: 53


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Numba_go_up
> **Author:** [@Numba_go_up](https://x.com/Numba_go_up)  
> **Metrics:** 10 likes · 1 retweets · 3 comments · 1.6K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Numba_go_up/status/2084676375198261738](https://x.com/Numba_go_up/status/2084676375198261738)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows an OpenSea NFT collection page for "Hoodrats" by hoodmint2, displaying a floor price of $76.10, 24H volume of $32.8K, 863 holders, and individual Hoodrat NFT listings (#1196 marked "Unavailable" and #1203 priced at $76.10). The image appears to support the post's accusation by showcasing a high-fee, potentially fraudulent NFT minting project on OpenSea, with the "Unavailable" status on item #1196 possibly hinting at the scam or rug-pull behavior the poster is criticizing.  

> 
> ".
@opensea
 you are a bunch of faggots for letting this scam grift mint and steal customers funds via the fees. Shame on you for taking a check to hurt your users. This ends one way with your team in jail and I’ll gladly take the stand"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Adventures2Xp` (https://x.com/Adventures2Xp)