# $BABYDOGE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-04 19:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $BABYDOGE  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-04 19:30 UTC (2026-08-04T19:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-04-19-30/crypto/BABYDOGE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-04-19-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 242
- **Likes:** 9
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 1, Likes: 9, Impressions: 242


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Fonta1n3
> **Author:** [@Fonta1n3](https://x.com/Fonta1n3)  
> **Metrics:** 8 likes · 2 retweets · 2 comments · 216 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Fonta1n3/status/2084546883351900502](https://x.com/Fonta1n3/status/2084546883351900502)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a technical vulnerability advisory (VULN-027 / VULN-105) for a "Change-address validation bypass" in `shared/psbt.py` lines 1766–1792, detailing how three early-exit conditions (including `if inp.fully_signed`) allow an attacker co-signer to bypass change-validation logic in multisig transactions. This directly supports the post's warning about a critical Coldcard multisig bug where change addresses can falsely appear verified as the user's, making it a legitimate security disclosure that justifies the call to move funds immediately.  

> 
> "There is currently a major critical bug for multisig in Coldcard even if you use multivendor multisig where the change address in your psbt can be verified as yours but in reality it is not!!! 

MOVE YOUR FUNDS NO MATTER WHAT! COLDCARD IS GARBAGE
@FullyNoded
 does an excellent"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@babyb000m_` (https://x.com/babyb000m_)