# $POLYMARKET Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-04 18:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $POLYMARKET  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-04 18:00 UTC (2026-08-04T18:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-04-18-00/crypto/POLYMARKET  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-04-18-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 61
- **Likes:** 4
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 0, Likes: 4, Impressions: 61


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Xeetbtcvox
> **Author:** [@Xeetbtcvox](https://x.com/Xeetbtcvox)  
> **Metrics:** 16 likes · 0 retweets · 10 comments · 1.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Xeetbtcvox/status/2084314863908635113](https://x.com/Xeetbtcvox/status/2084314863908635113)  


> **Visual Context:** A Telegram message from bot "Safio" traces an onchain path showing 5.4 ETH was withdrawn from a NONYM contract on Robinhood Chain to address 0x2D5c...ba0C, bridged to 5.39452 ETH via Relay, and swapped for 16.97643 BNB (~$10,055) that was sent to a labeled Binance 51 wallet—evidence supporting claims that NONYM rugged users' funds.  

> 
> "Nonym rugged"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@pronoy` (https://x.com/pronoy)