# $REAL Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-04 11:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $REAL  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-04 11:00 UTC (2026-08-04T11:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-04-11-00/crypto/REAL  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-04-11-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 458
- **Likes:** 3
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 3, Impressions: 458


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @nhunghuytam
> **Author:** [@nhunghuytam](https://x.com/nhunghuytam)  
> **Metrics:** 8 likes · 0 retweets · 7 comments · 35 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/nhunghuytam/status/2084429899255976308](https://x.com/nhunghuytam/status/2084429899255976308)  


> **Visual Context:** An infographic titled 'Why does Retium use weight-based fees instead of fixed fees?' explaining transaction fees with diagrams comparing fixed fees versus weight-based fees, emphasizing fairness, efficiency, and sustainability.  

> 
> "Why Does Retium Use Weight-Based Fees Instead of Fixed Fees?

One detail I almost overlooked in the Retium whitepaper was its approach to transaction fees.

Instead of relying on a simple fixed-fee model, Retium introduces weight-based fees.

At first, I thought it was just"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@strivex_` (https://x.com/strivex_)