# $PACK Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-03 23:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $PACK  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-03 23:40 UTC (2026-08-03T23:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-03-23-40/crypto/PACK  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-03-23-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 18
- **Likes:** 3
- **Retweets:** 3
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 3, Likes: 3, Impressions: 18


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @terra_army
> **Author:** [@terra_army](https://x.com/terra_army)  
> **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 338 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/terra_army/status/2084296233674498058](https://x.com/terra_army/status/2084296233674498058)  


> **Visual Context:** An infographic analyzing the 'LUNC 1.5% TAX POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE?' for Terra Classic cryptocurrency, comparing scenarios where higher burn activity is positive (Scenario 1: 3x more burn) versus decreased burn (Scenario 2: burn decreased).  

> 
> "The new 1.5% on-chain tax for 
$LUNC
 is a double-edged sword.  Pros: • 3x higher tax means more LUNC burned per on-chain transaction. • If transaction volume stays strong, supply could shrink faster over time.

 Cons: • Higher fees may discourage users, traders, and"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@NondualAF` (https://x.com/NondualAF)