# $MEXC Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-03 18:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $MEXC  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-03 18:00 UTC (2026-08-03T18:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-03-18-00/crypto/MEXC  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-03-18-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 44
- **Likes:** 5
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 5

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 5, Retweets: 0, Likes: 5, Impressions: 44


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @luge517
> **Author:** [@luge517](https://x.com/luge517)  
> **Metrics:** 22 likes · 0 retweets · 4 comments · 2.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/luge517/status/2084207455664492871](https://x.com/luge517/status/2084207455664492871)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a GMGN trading interface displaying a portfolio entry for the token "币有" (bì yǒu, contract 0xe9...7777) with a total profit of +$13.83K (+545.72%) on a current position value of $12.78K, against total buys of $2.5K and sells of $3.56K. This illustrates the poster's frustration: despite personally backing the original "币有" coin early and recommending it multiple times, its momentum was hijacked by a same-name copycat token, making the gains shown bittersweet rather than a clean victory.  

> 
> "I've been particularly bullish on this asset from the very start.

I've recommended it on Twitter five or six times, and I bought in at 1% myself.
In the end, the coin's stock meme got completely overshadowed and killed off by a same-name coin that stole the flow.

Got so pissed"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@BhavikxWeb3` (https://x.com/BhavikxWeb3)