# $OCH Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-02 23:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $OCH  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-02 23:20 UTC (2026-08-02T23:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-02-23-20/crypto/OCH  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-02-23-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 63
- **Likes:** 7
- **Retweets:** 2
- **Comments:** 4

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 4, Retweets: 2, Likes: 7, Impressions: 63


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @TXMCtrades
> **Author:** [@TXMCtrades](https://x.com/TXMCtrades)  
> **Metrics:** 9 likes · 0 retweets · 3 comments · 2.8K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/TXMCtrades/status/2083956297322340646](https://x.com/TXMCtrades/status/2083956297322340646)  


> **Visual Context:** The image is a Glassnode chart titled "Number of Sending Addresses" tracking BTC's Number of Sending Addresses (3d ema) from October 2024 through August 2026, with the latest value circled at approximately 575K—near historical highs despite the range mostly fluctuating between 400K-550K. This supports the post's point that the Coldcard hardware wallet exploit had minimal market impact, as Bitcoin's on-chain sending activity remains robust and unaffected by the niche security incident.  

> 
> "I've seen some folks expressing surprise that Bitcoin didn't have a big selloff due to the Coldcard news. I didn't expect that it would. We're talking about a hardware exploit on a niche manufacturer. It's impactful for some of the always-online maxi crowd and their relatives,"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@lalabala71` (https://x.com/lalabala71)