# $JTO Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-02 22:50 UTC > **Asset:** $JTO > **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-02 22:50 UTC (2026-08-02T22:50:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-02-22-50/crypto/JTO > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-02-22-50/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 1 - **Total Impressions:** 140 - **Likes:** 23 - **Retweets:** 0 - **Comments:** 24 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 24, Retweets: 0, Likes: 23, Impressions: 140 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @steepdawn974 > **Author:** [@steepdawn974](https://x.com/steepdawn974) > **Metrics:** 14 likes · 5 retweets · 1 comments · 394 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/steepdawn974/status/2083963338661232735](https://x.com/steepdawn974/status/2083963338661232735) > **Visual Context:** The image displays a dark-themed GitHub pull request page from the "btcd/btcd" repository by "Roasbeef," titled "**build: Merge bitcoin/ln: release notes**," highlighting a list of bullet-pointed update items such as "Misc bug fixes," version bumps to "0.12.0-beta," removal of "strongree.go," and tags like "wallet/db," "lnd/contractcourt," and "Modulate attributes caching." The accompanying post's critique about "Commit directly to master one developer No reviews" is directly evidenced by this PR's interface, which shows a single-author contribution being merged without review, supporting the claim that arguments attacking Luke Dashjr's (Bitcoin Knots) development practices were hypocritical, as similar lone-developer, no-review merges occur in other Bitcoin projects like btcd. > > ""Commit directly to master one developer No reviews .. etc" were arguments to character-assassinate @LukeDashjr /Knots (though they were mostly just picking from Core) by some of the same influencer people who shilled Coinkite" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@mempoolterm` (https://x.com/mempoolterm)