# $XBT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-01 08:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $XBT  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-01 08:50 UTC (2026-08-01T08:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-01-08-50/crypto/XBT  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-01-08-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 651
- **Likes:** 18
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 13

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 13, Retweets: 0, Likes: 18, Impressions: 651


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @foogyla
> **Author:** [@foogyla](https://x.com/foogyla)  
> **Metrics:** 21 likes · 5 retweets · 2 comments · 1.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/foogyla/status/2083207231449727044](https://x.com/foogyla/status/2083207231449727044)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a wallet reputation dashboard for "foogy" (address 0x9812...FEE1) with a score of 69/100, 3 detected agent NFTs, 0.013 ETH scan credit, and 1 saved report. This relates to the post by illustrating the new reputation-based whitelist system, where a wallet's score (69/100) serves as its qualification metric for accessing whitelists, with on-chain history and holdings quality factored into the assessment.  

> 
> "I've been talking about how we should have a reputation system for whitelists and how GTD should indeed be a GTD.

Now, we just built that.
A system where your wallet score is your pass to whitelists, and your actions after receving the WL will be recorded and monitored.

A"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@sue_xbt` (https://x.com/sue_xbt)