# $ITL Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-01 04:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $ITL  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-01 04:00 UTC (2026-08-01T04:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-01-04-00/crypto/ITL  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-01-04-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 36
- **Likes:** 3
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 3, Impressions: 36


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @ScarlettMetaX
> **Author:** [@ScarlettMetaX](https://x.com/ScarlettMetaX)  
> **Metrics:** 11 likes · 0 retweets · 3 comments · 192 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ScarlettMetaX/status/2083322330457964817](https://x.com/ScarlettMetaX/status/2083322330457964817)  


> **Visual Context:** A trading activity list on Doginal Dogs showing recent buyer transactions priced between 44,999 and 140,000 (with one OTC), where buyers including Switch, Paws, Leah, and Raf—many noted as wizard holders—purchased various dog NFTs (#566, #832, #9930, #8915, #8266, #6577, #2750, #4522, #8951, #3515), supporting the claim that wizards are actively and selectively accumulating dog NFTs from the @doginaldogs collection.  

> 
> "10/10 of the last sales are wizard holders.

17/35 of the top holders hold wizards.

The wizards aren't buying randomly. 
@doginaldogs
 @Dogwartsdao"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Venkat969789360` (https://x.com/Venkat969789360)