# $ANSEM Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-28 23:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $ANSEM  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-28 23:30 UTC (2026-07-28T23:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-28-23-30/crypto/ANSEM  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-28-23-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 985
- **Likes:** 60
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 31

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 31, Retweets: 1, Likes: 60, Impressions: 985


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Decentralizd
> **Author:** [@Decentralizd](https://x.com/Decentralizd)  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 198 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Decentralizd/status/2082181912781877401](https://x.com/Decentralizd/status/2082181912781877401)  


> **Visual Context:** A dark-themed dashboard titled "BIP-110 Signaling Blocks" lists 94 total blocks mined by OCEAN-affiliated pools (Roughnecks, SoV, JAMN, PyBLOCK-Datum, 888, Moonwalkit, SpammersGFY, and "Just For Krypto") between July 19-28, 2026, with block heights ranging from 958,718 to 959,986. The image backs up the post's argument by showing that BIP-110 signaling blocks are a tiny minority compared to the vast majority of regular non-signaling Bitcoin blocks mined every 10 minutes, making the anti-BIP-110 stance the overwhelming default.  

> 
> "my brother the 'anti bip-110 blocks' are literally every single other block every 10 mins on average for the rest of bitcoins life

pack it up kid"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@cryptansha` (https://x.com/cryptansha)