# $OPENSEA Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-28 23:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $OPENSEA  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-28 23:00 UTC (2026-07-28T23:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-28-23-00/crypto/OPENSEA  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-28-23-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 2
- **Total Impressions:** 779
- **Likes:** 2
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 0, Likes: 2, Impressions: 779


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @coinkritik
> **Author:** [@coinkritik](https://x.com/coinkritik)  
> **Metrics:** 18 likes · 1 retweets · 0 comments · 2.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/coinkritik/status/2081838626313277843](https://x.com/coinkritik/status/2081838626313277843)  


> **Visual Context:** A dashboard from DeFiLlama showing the TVL status of the top 10 Perp DEXs as of July 27, 2026, with a total TVL of $8.76B (-8.27% 30-day change). Hyperliquid leads at $6.136B, followed by Jupiter Perps ($1.546B on Solana) and Aster ($754.12M on BNB Chain), while protocols like GRVT and StandX show significant declines of -21% and -20.40% respectively. The chart visually reinforces the post's claim that TVL is a reliable, hard-to-inflate metric for evaluating perpetual DEX protocols and estimating token FDV based on its trajectory.  

> 
> "Some TVLs in certain perps. I always say that TVL can't be inflated and it's the most realistic metric. This is important for both CEX and DEX. There's also a serious correlation between the token's value and TVL; you can estimate FDV by looking at the trajectory of the perps'"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@anonchain` (https://x.com/anonchain)

- `@opensea` (https://x.com/opensea)