# $STRC Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-25 10:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $STRC  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-25 10:50 UTC (2026-07-25T10:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-25-10-50/crypto/STRC  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-25-10-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 952
- **Likes:** 5
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 5, Impressions: 952


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @TheMoonShow
> **Author:** [@TheMoonShow](https://x.com/TheMoonShow)  
> **Metrics:** 4 likes · 1 retweets · 2 comments · 701 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/TheMoonShow/status/2080960499957604542](https://x.com/TheMoonShow/status/2080960499957604542)  


> 
> "ICYMI: Patrick Witt said the Clarity Act is NOT "a giveaway  to crypto by any means." 

Despite what the opponents believe, "This bill imposes burdens and responsibilities on crypto companies in the space."

[Spoken audio]: I think you hit on a great point, which is a misconception that this is somehow a giveaway to crypto. I spend, if not half of my day, arguably a majority of my day talking with crypto stakeholders who have major concerns about the burdens that are being placed on them in this bill. So it's kind of inverted that you have Elizabeth Warren speaking out against the bill. She's basically advocating for continued unregulated markets for crypto. So this bill imposes burdens and responsibilities on crypto companies in the space. It's not a giveaway by any means."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@TheMoonShow` (https://x.com/TheMoonShow)