# $GME Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-24 17:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $GME  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-24 17:40 UTC (2026-07-24T17:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-24-17-40/crypto/GME  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-24-17-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 10.5K
- **Likes:** 102
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 23

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 23, Retweets: 1, Likes: 102, Impressions: 10495


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Neolawyer1
> **Author:** [@Neolawyer1](https://x.com/Neolawyer1)  
> **Metrics:** 20 likes · 4 retweets · 4 comments · 1.0K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Neolawyer1/status/2080685419406975167](https://x.com/Neolawyer1/status/2080685419406975167)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a post detailing that $TIBBIR (Ribbita by Virtuals) was stealth-launched on Base on January 11, 2025, with a 1B fixed supply, and includes a denial statement from @ribbita2012 on January 24, 2025, clarifying that $TIBBIR is not affiliated with Ribbit Capital. This contrasts with the accompanying post's argument that $TIBBIR actually had Ribbit Capital connections, dismissing the denial as a temporary AI chatbot hallucination that was quickly corrected.  

> 
> "This comparison falls apart on every level.
@ribbita2012
 was running as an AI chatbot back then. The initial ticker was $RIBBIT, not $TIBBIR, so the bot kept hallucinating. That config lag fixed almost immediately. 

Now look at what $TIBBIR actually had:

Ribbit Capital people"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@gkisokay` (https://x.com/gkisokay)