# $CHILLHOUSE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-22 07:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $CHILLHOUSE  
> **Momentum Status:** Sudden Spike  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-22 07:40 UTC (2026-07-22T07:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-22-07-40/crypto/CHILLHOUSE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-22-07-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 2.7K
- **Likes:** 88
- **Retweets:** 9
- **Comments:** 9

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 9, Retweets: 9, Likes: 88, Impressions: 2699


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @BitcoinMotorist
> **Author:** [@BitcoinMotorist](https://x.com/BitcoinMotorist)  
> **Metrics:** 106 likes · 16 retweets · 10 comments · 1.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/BitcoinMotorist/status/2079438603076383177](https://x.com/BitcoinMotorist/status/2079438603076383177)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of two tweets showing Sasha Hodler dismissing BIP110 as creating a "dead isolated chain," and a user named NEED criticizing BIP110, while another reply features a bearded man wearing a "BIP110" cap and pink sunglasses sitting in a DXRacer gaming chair. The tweets support the post's claim that NFT/Ordinal proponents oppose BIP110, reinforcing that their resistance is "counter-signal" validating the proposal.  

> 
> "Here are two people I used to consider IRL friends. One's an NFT scammer and the other's an Ordinal scammer. Neither likes BIP110. This is a feature. NFT/Ordinal scammers aren't supposed to like BIP110. This is pure counter-signal #BIP110Summer"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@slander_eth` (https://x.com/slander_eth)