# $RUNE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-21 22:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $RUNE  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-21 22:30 UTC (2026-07-21T22:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-21-22-30/crypto/RUNE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-21-22-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 1.1K
- **Likes:** 5
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 1, Likes: 5, Impressions: 1137


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @0xDvox
> **Author:** [@0xDvox](https://x.com/0xDvox)  
> **Metrics:** 105 likes · 15 retweets · 26 comments · 3.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/0xDvox/status/2079661013138583684](https://x.com/0xDvox/status/2079661013138583684)  


> **Visual Context:** The image is a side-by-side comparison chart titled "Arbitrum vs Base: Two L2s. Two Growth Strategies," highlighting Arbitrum's high-turnover capital movement versus Base's capital retention. Key figures shown include Arbitrum's $1.18B 7D bridge inflow and $190.92M net flow compared to Base's $415.63M inflow and $34M net flow, with Arbitrum at $1.41B total TVL versus Base's $4.67B. The chart visually reinforces the post's message that Arbitrum leads in attention and capital velocity while Base excels at holding capital long-term.  

> 
> "Arbitrum and Base are not fighting the same battle right now.

Arbitrum is winning the attention flow.
Base is winning the capital stickiness game.

In the last 7 days, Arbitrum pulled in around $1.18B through bridges versus Base at $415M. Net flow is even louder: $190M for"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@THORChain` (https://x.com/THORChain)