# $ALPACA Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-20 13:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $ALPACA  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-20 13:10 UTC (2026-07-20T13:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-20-13-10/crypto/ALPACA  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-20-13-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 20.1K
- **Likes:** 14
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 13

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 13, Retweets: 1, Likes: 14, Impressions: 20120


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @neodot
> **Author:** [@neodot](https://x.com/neodot)  
> **Metrics:** 138 likes · 18 retweets · 15 comments · 11.4K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/neodot/status/2078937150238740489](https://x.com/neodot/status/2078937150238740489)  


> **Visual Context:** A dark-themed dashboard shows key metrics for the "Pons" protocol, displaying $101.4m in annualized fees and $16.09m in annualized revenue, alongside protocol information describing it as a token launchpad on Robinhood Chain. This data supports the claim that $PONS is significantly undervalued, with the strong fee and revenue figures backing the assertion of a 10x fair value market cap.  

> 
> "$PONS fair value market cap is at minimum 10x what it is now 

this is crazy data, 
@ponsdotfamily
 already at 100m annualized fees and 16m annualized revenue 

so much fucking higher."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@CoinMarketCap` (https://x.com/CoinMarketCap)