# $UNI Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-20 01:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $UNI  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-20 01:10 UTC (2026-07-20T01:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-20-01-10/crypto/UNI  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-20-01-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 31
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 31


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @100Baggers_NFT
> **Author:** [@100Baggers_NFT](https://x.com/100Baggers_NFT)  
> **Metrics:** 31 likes · 3 retweets · 1 comments · 1.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/100Baggers_NFT/status/2078769809953616039](https://x.com/100Baggers_NFT/status/2078769809953616039)  


> **Visual Context:** A stat card shows a "PERMANENT" staking tier offering 2,648% APR with a 4.00x multiplier, noting 87.52% of SLVR is staked and yielding 0.24995 ETH/day per 10 SLVR—reinforcing the post's claim that the vast majority of $SLVR supply has been locked/burned by holders securing the protocol's revenue stream.  

> 
> "87% of all staked 
$slvr
 has been burned because holders believe in the protocol and want to have ownership of the revenue stream.

Locking has surpassed issuance.

There is not enough 
$slvr
 to go around.."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@jpn_memelord` (https://x.com/jpn_memelord)