# $NFT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-19 21:30 UTC > **Asset:** $NFT > **Momentum Status:** Stable > **Timestamp:** 2026-07-19 21:30 UTC (2026-07-19T21:30:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-19-21-30/crypto/NFT > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-19-21-30/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 2 - **Total Impressions:** 249 - **Likes:** 15 - **Retweets:** 6 - **Comments:** 4 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 4, Retweets: 6, Likes: 15, Impressions: 249 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @clipsofcrypto > **Author:** [@clipsofcrypto](https://x.com/clipsofcrypto) > **Metrics:** 4 likes · 1 retweets · 2 comments · 112 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/clipsofcrypto/status/2078955614718628277](https://x.com/clipsofcrypto/status/2078955614718628277) > > ""The market for compliant finance onchain is a million times bigger than the market for illicit activity onchain" Rand, founder of Zama, on how compliance actually works when transactions are private "People think about compliance as KYC, but compliance is primarily about [Spoken audio]: Compliance, people think about compliance as KYC, right? Compliance is different. Compliance is primarily about how can you make sure that people using your products are using it for legitimate reasons? So how do you make sure that North Korea is not laundering money? How do you make sure that a terrorist group is not getting funded that way? And we don't want that. I wanna be very clear about something. The market for compliant finance on Shane is a million times bigger than the market for illicit activity on Shane. The terrorist financing, money laundering is a tiny use case in comparison to banks settling on Shane, people paying for the groceries and investors putting money into all kinds of different ETFs. So we've made a position very clear, Zama will not welcome illicit activity in the protocol period. And the way that we do that is that we enable the token issuers and the DeFi companies and the financial service providers to build their compliance rules directly into their confidential assets and applications in the Zama protocol. So when I'm issuing confidential USDC after someone deposited USDC, the user can see their own balance, obviously, but me as the token issuer, I can also authorize myself or my compliance officer to see all the activities of people using my assets. And so by doing that, you're kind of recreating what Tri-Fi has today, where I see my bank account, my bank sees my bank account, but the world doesn't see it right now. Yeah. Right? And then compliance is just track fight compliance. You don't have to reinvent it. You know, it's just, it's the same as we've had. All right, so it literally doesn't, it doesn't allow for any illicit activity. It has the same protections. It just gives you like, if I want to go to a store and pay with cash, the world doesn't need to know that I went and paid with cash. Exactly. And we've even- I mean, I'm doing anything wrong. I'm just paying with cash. Exactly. And we've gone one way, one step further than this. We've actually, we do what's called Transitive compliance so if the underlying asset is shielded let's say if you as if you're shielding USDC into confidential USDC if circle freezes an address in USDC it Automatically propagates and freezes the asset in confidential USDC as well So you don't actually have to do anything, you know You just need circle to do what they're doing and then it will just propagate into confidential USDC automatically And I really think that this is how it should be You know, I don't think that we, as a protocol, should decide what assets should be frozen, but the token issuer who's issuing confidential stable coins or whatever else, they can decide whatever they want this right for their own business. Yeah, you couldn't work with USDC and Tether if that wasn't the case, because they've always very transparently said, you know, we work with law enforcement, if there's a lift to the activity, they freeze things, right, that's normal. So it has nothing to do with you. Yeah, just do it. You know, not our problem." ### Post #2 by @Crypto_Crib_ > **Author:** [@Crypto_Crib_](https://x.com/Crypto_Crib_) > **Metrics:** 15 likes · 0 retweets · 2 comments · 8.6K views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Crypto_Crib_/status/2078903065424331079](https://x.com/Crypto_Crib_/status/2078903065424331079) > **Visual Context:** A CryptoQuant chart titled "Top Buyer Capitulation" showing BTC price (black line, left axis) alongside BTC sent at loss to exchanges (purple) and realized loss USD (red) from 2013 through 2025, with the largest loss spike occurring in late 2025 reaching ~80M+ USD, visually supporting the post's claim that top buyers are capitulating at massive rates—a pattern historically associated with market bottoms. > > "Top blasters are capitulating at a HUGE rate. Historically this always happens near the bottom." --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@Redmanj79` (https://x.com/Redmanj79) - `@cheuk_baby` (https://x.com/cheuk_baby)