# $RWA Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-17 18:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $RWA  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-17 18:40 UTC (2026-07-17T18:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-17-18-40/crypto/RWA  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-17-18-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 769
- **Likes:** 68
- **Retweets:** 19
- **Comments:** 24

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 24, Retweets: 19, Likes: 68, Impressions: 769


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @BitMEX_Jon
> **Author:** [@BitMEX_Jon](https://x.com/BitMEX_Jon)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 182 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/BitMEX_Jon/status/2078188154817777717](https://x.com/BitMEX_Jon/status/2078188154817777717)  


> **Visual Context:** A Foundry announcement document titled 'BIP-110 Voting' dated July 16, 2026, addressed to 'Hi Foundry USA Pool Account Owners,' explains a proposal regarding the Bitcoin protocol and signaling on BIP-110.  

> 
> "Foundry Services announces an absolute car crash of a policy on BIP-110



If 51% of their miners vote for BIP-110, either: 

A. There won't be enforcement & the pool 
will false flag for BIP-110,  or

B. The pool will decide whether to enforce the softfork with a 0 block"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@EhDhizy` (https://x.com/EhDhizy)