# $XTZ Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-14 03:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $XTZ  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-14 03:40 UTC (2026-07-14T03:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-14-03-40/crypto/XTZ  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-14-03-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 64
- **Likes:** 4
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 2

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 2, Retweets: 1, Likes: 4, Impressions: 64


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @dogdamassa
> **Author:** [@dogdamassa](https://x.com/dogdamassa)  
> **Metrics:** 10 likes · 6 retweets · 1 comments · 259 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/dogdamassa/status/2076853036798849299](https://x.com/dogdamassa/status/2076853036798849299)  


> 
> "BIP-110 proposes changing the proof-of-work rules to allow validating nodes to reject blocks containing transactions with fees below a minimum threshold, effectively making market-rate fees mandatory. In my view, this proposal violates the fundamental principle that each node"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Ferdoropeza` (https://x.com/Ferdoropeza)